The academy also videotaped an object on the floor of the loch resembling a carcass and found marine clamshells and a fungus-like organism not normally found in freshwater lochs, a suggested connection to the sea and a possible entry for the creature. In 2004, a Five TV documentary team, using cinematic special-effects experts, tried to convince people that there was something in the loch. David Bailin of Citi Global Wealth and Saira Malik of Nuveen debate the probability of a recession and discuss where they’re finding opportunities in equities and fixed income. for the) possibility that there just might be continues to enthrall a small number for whom eye-witness evidence outweighs all other considerations".

Analysis of the echosounder images seemed to indicate debris at the bottom of the loch, although there was motion in three of the pictures. The seiche created in Loch Ness by the catastrophic 1755 Lisbon earthquake was reportedly "so violent as to threaten destruction to some houses built on the sides of it", while the 1761 aftershock caused two-foot (60 cm) waves.

This book title, El monstruo del lago Ness: Una misteriosa bestia en Escocia (The Loch Ness Monster: Scotland's Mystery Beast), ISBN: 9781435825383, by Jack DeMolay, published by The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc (July 30, 2008) is available in hardcover. Details of how the photo was taken were published in the 1999 book, Nessie – the Surgeon's Photograph Exposed, which contains a facsimile of the 1975 Sunday Telegraph article. He undertook a final expedition, using sonar and an underwater camera in an attempt to find a carcass. From the reader series Lecturas de Enigma y Misterio, a collection of graded readers set in different places around Spain and Latin America in which mystery takes center stage.

The best-known article that first attracted a great deal of attention about a creature was published on 2 May 1933 in The Inverness Courier, about a large "beast" or "whale-like fish". To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. One photograph appeared to show the head, neck, and upper torso of a plesiosaur-like animal, [108] but sceptics argue the object is a log due to the lump on its "chest" area, the mass of sediment in the full photo, and the object's log-like "skin" texture. In 2006, palaeontologist and artist Neil Clark suggested that travelling circuses might have allowed elephants to bathe in the loch; the trunk could be the perceived head and neck, with the head and back the perceived humps. This sighting triggered a massive amount of public interest and an uptick in alleged sightings, leading to the solidification of the actual name "Loch Ness Monster.W. Holiday proposed that Nessie and other lake monsters, such as Morag, may be a large invertebrate such as a bristleworm; he cited the extinct Tullimonstrum as an example of the shape. It lurched across the road toward the loch 20 yards (18 m) away, leaving a trail of broken undergrowth in its wake. It has also been noted that the object in his film does not actually submerge as often perceived but blends into the greyer reflections on the water. Grant produced a sketch of the creature that was examined by zoologist Maurice Burton, who stated it was consistent with the appearance and behavior of an otter. In doing so he also discredits any strong connection between kelpies or water-horses and the modern "media-augmented" creation of the Loch Ness Monster.