When testing the Nanoflex TRs, Amanda realized they’re an ideal fit for some types of workouts but not for others. For most workouts, they performed just okay. But for one type, the Nanoflex TRs excelled.

To break down each shoe’s performance, I’m going to compare each model in the context of lifting and CrossFit, versatile training, and running, then select a winner and discuss my thoughts as to why. Stability With Lifting and CrossFit The Nanoflex TR grips gym floors really well and as a whole, I haven’t noticed any durability issues with this model’s outsole construction. On the Reebok Nano X, we have the signature split outsole construction to promote forefoot and heel separation and the meta-split feature throughout the forefoot. These shoes just don’t provide the level of stability you need for heavy powerlifting and the Oly lifts. Amanda did, however, find them comfortable for what CrossFitters call accessory work: movements like split squats, Romanian deadlifts, and strict dumbbell presses. (Basically anything where the feet stay planted and you’re not going super heavy.) Wearing Reebok Nanoflex Training Shoes for Cardio A shoe intended for intense workouts. Step up your flexibility with its rubber outsole with flex grooves. Lean into toughness and comfort with its athletic mesh and CMEVA midsole cushion. Reebok Nanoflex TR Training Shoe womens side Photo Credits The Reebok Nanoflex TR does not feature a removable insole. On top of this, it’s not even an insole that only has a little adhesive keeping it in place. The insole in this model is firmly built-in and I’d suggest not removing it to prevent any early breakdown in this model. For this reason, I don’t think the Nanoflex TR is good for anyone with custom insoles and orthotics. Reebok Nanoflex TR Vs Nano X1 Vs Nano X Durability

These shoes work fine for some types of CrossFit WODs. They’re definitely not ideal for all functional fitness workouts. Amanda had no problem wearing the Nanoflex TRs while doing lunges, kettlebell swings, lightweight squats, and anything that didn’t really involve her feet (like shoulder press, pull-ups, and push-ups). But when it came to box jumps, handstand push-ups, power cleans, and snatches, her “inner NoBull snob” came out and she was missing the stability and balance that comes with a flatter, more purposefully designed shoe.

Whether or not the Nanoflex TRs are good for lifting depends entirely on the type of lifting you do. If you sway toward hypertrophy workouts, supersets, and high-rep straight sets, you’ll probably like the Nanoflex TR training shoes. A shoe designed to endure intense workouts. Its rubber outsole with flex grooves allows you to move freely and make the most out of each workout. Reebok Nanoflex TR Training Shoe Upper Closeup The mesh upper keeps your feet cool during intense training. And while we’re at it, the shoe has a TPU heel clip that reinforces stability. There really isn’t an outsole construction of these three that is an under-performer. They’re all very different and excel in different contexts for slightly different reasons. In a training context, the outsoles on these models all perform consistently well. MidsoleI can tell you why: These shoes have a highly responsive midsole, which results in some springy action, making HIIT movements like high knees, toe taps, jumping rope, jump squats, and other explosive plyometric movements feel easier. To make the following section easier to read through, I’ve broken down this construction section into multiple parts. Outsole Workout shoes are an important piece of gear that most invest in for their best home gym equipment. Unless you’re one of those barefoot folks (which I am often as well). A good pair of shoes—and more importantly, the best pair for you—is the difference between an invigorating workout and a dumpster fire of a training session.

The midsole constructions of these models are all fairly different, which is neither good nor bad, they’re just different. The Reebok Nanoflex TR has a consistent foam midsole throughout that offers a fairly consistent blend of responsiveness and stability. To be honest, the midsole in this model is one of the main reasons I’m reminded as to why this is the budget-friendly Reebok Nano. That being said, if you’re training more casually in a versatile context and need a budget-friendly model, then I do the Reebok Nanoflex TR is a good option. It will get the job done for most who are wearing them for hour-long sessions here and there or to classes. The Reebok Nano X1 and Nanoflex TR have fully mesh uppers. The Nano X1’s mesh breathes a bit better and has a bit more stretch to it which gives it a slightly more maneuverable fit and feel compared to the Nanoflex TR’s upper. The Reebok Nanoflex TR’s mesh has a bit more of a gritty feel to it and doesn’t stretch nearly as well as the Nano X1. Laces and Tongue I like the lug patterning on the outsole of this model as it provides adequate traction on a variety of surfaces. In addition, the Floatride Energy Foam midsole provides a nice bounce with this model and makes it a solid model not beating up the feet with longer sessions that include a bunch of jumping. Reebok Nano X: True-to-size. Generally, this model fits the best, but a small population of lifters may experience heel slip in this model and since there are only five eyelets you can be limited with navigating that issue with this model.The only thing Amanda was absolutely not thrilled about was the forefoot construction on the Nanoflex TRs. The toe box is super narrow and, while the upper does have some give and will break in eventually, the first couple of workouts in these shoes were hardly short of excruciating. Props to Amanda for pushing on in the name of product testing. Reebok Nanoflex Training Shoes Colorways and Design The Reebok Nanoflex TR is the lowest tier model between the three when it comes to supporting heavier lifting. This model is marketed as a budget-friendly Reebok Nano and it’s pretty clear to see that its construction doesn’t hold up to the same intensity of tasks as the Nano X and Nano X1. The Nanoflex TR training shoes make phenomenal everyday shoes—as long as you have narrow feet. If you don’t, all of the good aspects of this shoe are for naught.

The split outsole is flexible and the high-density forefoot midsole help to mitigate this model’s overall stability, however, it’s still not going to be a responsive as something like the Reebok Nano X1 and Reebok Nanoflex TR.The Nanoflex TRs are similar to the Nanos in a lot of ways. For example, they both have rubber outsoles, mesh uppers, and feel relatively flat. The Nanoflex TRs also have a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) heel cage and heel clip similar to that on the Nanos. The Reebok Nano X features a high-density foam midsole that you can see throughout the forefoot and has a TPU overlay covering the mid-foot and heel’s midsole. As a whole, the midsole in this model doesn’t compress a ton and it airs a bit more on the side of being more stable in its construction.