The only conventional explanation for reliable amnesia is when it is induced by some sort of chemical. Making the target unconscious or suggestible immediately and wiping their memory after the fact would be desirable tactics for any type of predator, if they can pull it off. Besides chemicals, one could make an argument for an uncommon EM, other type of radiation, or infrasound-based technologies, but nothing should be 100% reliable.

Regarding this profile point, I tend to agree with a number of people who say that Dave overestimates the weirdness of people leaving essential items behind, as you can easily do that when you don’t think you’ll be gone long or when you just have a standard brain fart. But I totally agree with Dave that the disappearing-while-on-the-phone stuff is weird. Especially in the one case when the phone was later found shattered into a million pieces. There are a few ways you can listen to the Missing 411 podcast. The easiest way is to head over to Audible.com, where you can sign up for a free trial and listen to the first episode. Medical emergency would then prevent you from wandering away very far, unless it was a psychotic break, but regardless, many of the missing were in excellent physical and mental health. Which leaves being jumped by someone or something as the most likely explanation. Especially considering that feeding grounds are a great place where to lie in wait for prey, and perhaps the best way to narrow down where people will be found in a big forest, and roughly when. This can be a standalone subset of cases.The sooner they are aware of the situation, the better their chances of finding the missing person.

Let’s approach this like a normal social scientist would approach reviewing a student’s thesis. Here are the most significant repeating profile points with my critical commentary as to their potential strengths and shortcomings: The only way how to prove that a synchronicity (coincidence that is manipulative) is taking place, as far as I can tell, is to guess at the logic behind it and then try to predict not necessarily what specific coincidence will happen, but at least the incidence aspect — that it will happen, or the time or rate at which coincidences will be happening in relation to a particular person or phenomenon. A good enough guess should allow you to try to force and maximize the coincidence by removing all normal ways of the expected manipulation happening naturally. At the risk or irritating the giv When the demand is high and the supply is low, prices are always high. That’s the case with Missing 411 books. Since the author published them himself, he couldn’t produce enough copies to satisfy the market. And sure, tests have to be named something and there is a limited number of letters in the alphabet. Granted, Elisa Lam is a rare name, so it’s a case of a rare name of a test that is the same as a human name, which was the same as a rare name of a person who died unusually, while the test was being used at the time and place where they died. That’s roughly a bit odd to the fourth power. The unusual death following a plot of a movie, an unusual plot, moves this coincidence to about a bit odd to the sixth power. How odd is enough?For example, children and adults with cognitive disabilities are more likely to be found alive than those without such impairments. In addition, people who go missing in rural areas are more likely to be found than those who disappear in urban areas. But it’s true that on the other, more paranoid hand, if the storms are somehow being caused (or foreseen and taken advantage of) to thwart searches, them succeeding in thwarting searches is not a disqualifying factor. It would be an annoyingly good crime, however, as it is very difficult to prove such crime for the above-mentioned reasons. Especially if it’s only about taking advantage of naturally forming bad weather, as that would then maintain its normal, statistically insignificant rate of incidence. The books publicized the fact that the National Park Service does not keep a comprehensive list of people who go missing in parks and although there’s a database for criminal and incident reports, it’s underutilized and doesn’t interface with other criminal databases. If a person disappeared from a place like a pub, then the perpetrators were either lying in wait on the location, possibly cooperating with whoever is operating the establishment, or they were again following the target person beforehand and waited for him to go to a social event. The reason why to wait for that could be that it is much less suspicious for a person to disappear while out drinking at night in the city than if they just left their house for no reason in the middle of the night. In any case, since many of the missing in cities were students, maybe they were targeted at school. They may run away from home, take a trip without telling anyone, or get lost while hiking or camping.

Subjects found alive having no memory of the disappearance, or giving an account that sounds incorrect, confused, or outright fantastical

If an area has been searched dozens of times, chances are the search was sufficient. Especially if the body wasn’t even found by dedicated searchers, but by random hikers or passersby after the search was over. This includes a number of cases of divers not finding the body, but random people on the shore finding it afterwards. Again without anyone seeing the body get in.